Subscribe to RSS Feed

National Institutes of Health Suggests Renaming of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Dr. David Samadi, Leading Robotic Prostate Surgeon, Expresses Concern Over Next Government Panel to Seemingly Downplay Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwire - Dec 9, 2011) - This week the National Institutes of Health (NIH) fueled ongoing medical debate over the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer by suggesting the possibility of removing the label "cancer" from low-risk prostate cancer. Further, the 14-member independent panel favors active monitoring of the disease verses early treatment. For many in the urologic oncology community, including Dr. David Samadi, Vice Chairman, Department of Urology, and Chief of Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgery at The Mount Sinai Medical Center, this appears to be yet another government panel's recommendation that has the potential to put many men at risk.

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The panel's consensus stems from estimations that 240,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in the U.S. this year, yet only an estimated 33,000 will die from the disease. Compounding their recommendation is the fact that some experts believe prostate cancer treatment introduces unnecessary health risks such as impotence and incontinence.

Dr. Samadi commented by saying, "True not all prostate cancers are deadly, but what the panel cannot avoid is the reality of our testing limitations. Today, I cannot tell a man with certainty that his prostate cancer won't develop into one of the unfortunate 33,000." Currently, prostate cancer is diagnosed through a PSA test to identify spikes in the level of prostate-specific antigens within the blood. Once detected, a prostate biopsy is usually performed to evaluate the tissue and assign a Gleason score for the risk level of the disease. "Regrettably, the Gleason score gives us some information, but not nearly enough to guarantee a slow progression," Dr. Samadi says.

Versus immediate treatment, the panel suggests "active monitoring" of the disease after diagnosis to include ongoing PSA testing and surveillance. The challenge, they admit, is determining the right point for introducing treatment. There is great difficulty in establishing "optimal protocol" for a disease that presents so differently in each patient. Often dubbed the silent killer, prostate cancer can exist without any symptoms, making it possible for the disease to spread throughout the body unbeknownst to its owner.

Regarding risks, Dr. Samadi believes a careful approach to treatment selection is critical. "Men have to do their research," he urges, "what's right for one man may not be right for another, but I do believe the best course for most men is to remove the cancer through prostatectomy." As a seasoned expert in robotic prostate surgery, Dr. Samadi has performed over 3,600 procedures with successful results. Based on his patients' experience, men who undergo robotic surgery in his hands can hope to resume normal urinary control within several months and sexual function within 12 to 24 months.

"Delaying treatment under the guise of active monitoring sounds like a spin to me," says Dr. Samadi. "In reality, it's the same passive, reactionary approach as watchful waiting." The panel's contemplation of changing the diagnosis altogether is also shocking to Dr. Samadi. "The idea that simply taking the word cancer out of a disease's name will change its implications is of concern to me," he said, "Downplaying a prostate cancer diagnosis to ease men's fears is not the answer."

Back to Press Releases

Bookmark Using:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Yahoo

Share on Facebook

Call to Make an Appointment With Dr. David Samadi:


Click the contact link to learn how Dr. Samadi can help treat your prostate cancer and give you back your quality of life.

* The benefits of robotic surgery cannot be guaranteed as surgery is both patient and procedure specific. Previous surgical results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Κ. β., Greece, Athens

Υγιης πλεον συνεχιζω ολες τις δραστηριοτητες μου.Εγω,η συζυγος μου και τα παιδια μας,σας ευγνωμονουμε.Σας ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ πολυ-πολυ,εσας και ολους τους εξαιρετικους συνεργατες σας. Σας ενημερωνω επισης, οτι στις 11 Φεβρουαριου 2010 εκανα και το δευτερο Τest P.S.A.:0,02 ng/ml...

Bill M., New York

I have had full urinary control for the three weeks since the catheter was removed. I am now back to my regular activities, pain free, enjoying our grandchildren, working on the house, and enjoying life.

Joe G., USA

I put my life, and my quality of life in the hands of the best surgeon I could find, DR. David Samadi.  My surgery was October 19th, 2009. I was walking around a few hours after surgery. I went home the next day.

Mario J., USA

Several weeks ago I found myself not waking from a nightmare but waking into one. This was after being diagnosed with cancer. My life was spiraling out of control and reaching the epitome of despair. In a true sense of the word, I was experiencing an existential crisis. At moments I even questioned whether my life was worth going forward.